Estimating the case fatality ratio for COVID-19 in real time during its epidemic is very challenging. Nevertheless, this ratio is a very important piece of data that will help to guide the response from various government and public health authorities worldwide. The disease has brought tremendous pressure and disastrous consequences for the public health and medical systems in Wuhan, as well as in Iran, Italy, and in other countries. However, current estimates of case fatality ratio for COVID-19 vary depending on the datasets and time periods examined. A study of nearly 1100 patients from China suggested a case fatality ratio of 1·4%.
From a dataset of 44 672 confirmed cases in China, a report from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
estimated an overall case fatality ratio of 2·3%, and pointed out that the ratio varied by location and intensity of transmission (eg, 2·9% in Hubei vs 0·4% in other areas of China), in different phases of the outbreak (eg, 14·4% before Dec 31, 15·6% for Jan 1–10, 5·7% for Jan 11–20, 1·9% Jan for 21–31, and 0·8% after Feb 1), as well as by sex (2·8% for males vs 1·7% for females). Moreover, the Chinese CDC reported that the case fatality ratio increases with age (from 0·2% for people aged 11–19 years, to 14·8% for people aged ≥80 years), and with the presence of comorbid conditions (10·5% for cardiovascular disease, 7·3% for diabetes, 6·0% for hypertension, 6·3% for chronic respiratory disease, and 5·6% for cancer). The WHO–China Joint Mission on COVID-19 provided similar data and reported a case fatality ratio of 3·8%, based on the 55 924 laboratory-confirmed cases in China.
In The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Robert Verity and colleagues provide an estimate of the case fatality ratio for COVID-19. The authors argue that crude case fatality ratios obtained by simply dividing the number of deaths by the number of cases can be misleading because there can be a period of 2–3 weeks between a person developing symptoms and that case being detected and reported, and because surveillance of a novel virus is biased towards detecting severe cases, especially at the beginning of an outbreak when test capacity is low. By using individual-case data from mainland China (3665 cases) and 1334 cases detected outside of mainland China, assuming a constant attack rate by age, and adjusting for demography and age-based and location-based under-ascertainment, Verity and colleagues estimate the mean duration from symptom onset to death to be 17·8 days (95% credible interval [CrI] 16·9–19·2) and from onset-of-symptoms to hospital discharge to be 24·7 days (22·9–28·1). The study findings give an estimate of the overall case fatality ratio in China of 1·38% (95% CrI 1·23–1·53), which becomes higher as age increases (figure).
Comparisons of case fatality ratios for SARS, COVID-19, and seasonal influenza in different age groups are shown in the figure. Even though the fatality rate is low for younger people, it is very clear that any suggestion of COVID-19 being just like influenza is false: even for those aged 20–29 years, once infected with SARS-CoV-2, the mortality rate is 33 times higher than that from seasonal influenza. For people aged 60 years and older, the chance of survival following SARS-CoV-2 infection is approximately 95% in the absence of comorbid conditions. However, the chance of survival will be considerably decreased if the patient has underlying health conditions, and continues to decrease with age beyond 60 years.